This mirror provides links to papers published in:
Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists Extended Abstracts,
Volume 2023 (2),
8th International Airborne Electromagnetics Workshop, 2023.
Use the search box below or your browser’s find function (CTRL+F) to locate a specific title or author string on this page.
Automated data processing of a large-scale airborne time-domain electromagnetic survey by a deep learning expert system
Muhammad Rizwan Asif, M. Andy Kass, Anders Vest Christiansen, Zara Rawlinson, Rogier Westerhoff.
An early time semi-airborne loop source TEM system
Esben Auken, Pradip K. Maurya, Anders Vest Christiansen, Lichao Liu, Jacob Juul Naundrup, Anders la Cour-Harbo, Michael Juul Nielsen.
Finding Geology Structures in Depth Sections from Airborne Geophysics: Automatic workflows
Desmond FitzGerald, Simge Ayfer.
Quantifying salinity in the layered coastal aquifers underlying and adjacent to Delaware Bay USA using AEM-derived resistivity
Lyndsay B. Ball, Burke J. Minsley, Gavin S. Wilson, Holly A. Michael, Douglas A. Burns, Mark R. Nardi, Emmanuel G. Charles.
Imaging volcanic systems via multi-scale electromagnetic imaging
Paul A Bedrosian, Carol A Finn, Jade Crosbie, Dana E Peterson, Jim Kauahikaua, Patricia MacQueen.
Helitem2 – System Updates for Broadband AEM Data
Darren Burrows, David Murray, Graham Konieczny.
Free AEM data over NSW, Australia
Astrid Carlton.
AEM-derived watersheds in crystalline domain under volcanic cover
Damien Ciolczyk, Pierre-Alexandre Reninger, Clotilde Bertin, Julien Bernard, Anne Raingeard, Pierre Belle, Lydie Gailler, Philippe Labazuy, Guillaume Martelet, Olivier Merle.
Perspectives on AEM processing for geophysical exploration in Canada and worldwide
Magdel Combrinck.
An AEM experience in Northern Italy. Innovative and multidisciplinary approach for a modern groundwater and land management
Matteo Gisolo, Luca Spagnoli, Silene Cresseri, Andrea Viezzoli.
Joint Inversions of AEM modelling AIP effects: Helicopter-borne, Ground IP and Fixed-Wing systems
Francesco Dauti, Andrea Viezzoli, Gianluca Fiandaca.
Estimating noise in AEM data
Aaron Davis.
California’s Statewide AEM Surveys: Project Implementation and Next Steps
Katherine Dlubac, Steven Springhorn, Benjamin Brezing, Ian Gottschalk, Paul Thorn, Timothy Parker, Chris Peterson.
Closing the gap between galvanic and inductive methods: EEMverter, a new 1D/2D/3D inversion tool for Electric and Electromagnetic data with focus on Induced Polarization
Gianluca Fiandaca, Bo Zhang, Jian Chen, Alessandro Signora, Francesco Dauti, Stefano Galli, Nicole Anna Lidia Sullivan, Arcangela Bollino, Andrea Viezzoli.
The Development of the TEMPEST AEM System
Andy Green.
Deep Learning for the Inversion of Airborne EM Data
Eldad Haber, Christoph Schwarzbach.
The last five years of Tempest System Development
Teo Hage, Eric Steele, Peter Wolfgram.
Advances in open-source software for 3D electromagnetics using SimPEG
Lindsey J. Heagy, Johnathan Kuttai, Devin Cowan, Joseph Capriotti, Seogi Kang, Dominique Fournier, Douglas W. Oldenburg.
Toward Open Science: Introducing the Geophysical Survey (GS) Data Standard and GSPy Toolbox
Stephanie R. James, Nathan Leon Foks, Burke J. Minsley.
Combined ground-UAV TDEM survey over gold prospect in BaikalPatom Highlands (eastern Russia) with detection of AIP effect.
Vladislav Kaminski, Yuri Davydenko, Sergey Bukhalov, Ivan Goryachev.
Analysis of the self-interference model and compensation methods in airborne electromagnetics
Evgeny Karshakov, Ekaterina Tretyakova, Dmitry Kaplun.
Integration of airborne transient electromagnetic models with ground geophysics and borehole data for groundwater mapping in Hawkes Bay region, New Zealand
Richard Kellett, Zara Rawlinson, Tusar Sahoo, Angela Griffin, Maiwenn Herpe, Conny Tschritter, Mark JF Lawrence, Simon Harper.
Modelling induced polarization effects in frequency-domain data
Evgeny Karshakov, Dmitry Khliustov.
Thoughts on layered inversions
Andrew King.
ZTEM Airborne Natural Field EM-Magnetics and Mineral Targeting Results over the Berg Porphyry Copper Project, near Houston, British Columbia.
Jean M. Legault, Karl Kwan, Shane Ebert.
Reconciling the previously incompatible through the continental scale AusAEM survey
Alan Yusen Ley-Cooper, Ross C. Brodie, Anandaroop Ray, Neil Symington.
HiQGA: Open source deterministic and probabilistic AEM inversion
Anandaroop Ray, Richard Taylor, Ross C. Brodie, Yusen LeyCooper, Neil Symington, Negin F. Moghaddam.
Design of BIPTEM: an airborne B field IP and TEM system
James Macnae, Terry Kratzer, Duncan Massie, Paul Rogerson.
System-scale airborne electromagnetic surveys in the lower Mississippi River Valley support multidisciplinary applications
Burke J Minsley, Ryan F Adams, William Asquith, Bethany L Burton, Bennett E Hoogenboom, Stephanie R James, Courtney Killian, Katherine J Knierim, Wade H Kress, Max Lindaman, Andy Leaf, J.R. Rigby, JP Traylor.
AEM survey of the Neretva Delta (Croatia): a case study for hydrogeology
John Moilanen, Pietro Teatini, Giulio Vignoli, Veljko Srzi.
The Valen Prospect: It’s SPM,… No it’s not,…Yes it is!.. No wait….
Tim Munday, Mike McMillan, Rod Paterson, Daniel Sattel, Camilla Sorensen, Noelene Dorn.
Developing a fully airborne drone TEM system
Nicklas Skovgaard Nyboe, Kristoffer Skovgaard Mohr.
Geotechnical ground investigations with a small airborne TEM prototype system
Martin Panzner, Andi A. Pfaffhuber, Nicklas Skovgaard Nyboe.
A Forward Model Study to Investigate 25, 12.5 and 6.25Hz AEM System responses to IP and SPM Effects in the Regolith
Rod Paterson, Jovan Silic.
Passive and active airborne electromagnetics – separate and combined technical solutions and applicability
Alexander Prikhodko, Andrei Bagrianski, Petr Kuzmin, Andrew Carpenter.
AEM imagery down to one kilometer depth: New constraints for geological and hydrogeological modeling in volcanic contexts
Anne Raingeard, Pierre-Alexandre Reninger, Aurelie Peyrefitte, Guillaume Martelet, Bertrand Aunay, Arnauld Malard.
Supervised stacking to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of AEM data
Pierre-Alexandre Reninger.
Airborne magnetics as structural guide in the 3D inversion of Airborne EM data
Carsten Scholl, Stephen Hallinan, Marianne Parsons, Tom Kimura.
BGR helicopter-borne frequency-domain EM – past, present, future
Bernhard Siemon.
The HydroGeosITe for AEM mapping: characterization through joint inversion of AEM, ground EM and DCIP data
Alessandro Signora, Stefano Galli, Matteo Gisolo, Gianluca Fiandaca.
Going the extra mile – Julimar, a case study from Western Australia
Camilla Soerensen, Tim Munday, Toke Hojbjerg Soltoft.
TEMPEST electromagnetic transmitters with multiple loops and multistep waveforms
Andrew Sunderland, Eric Steele.
Using regional airborne electromagnetic conductivity data to characterise surface water groundwater interaction in the Cooper Creek floodplain in arid central eastern Australia
Neil Symington, Tim Evans, Nadege Rollet, Larysa Halas, John Vizy, Sarah Buckerfield, Anandaroop Ray, Yusen Ley-Cooper, Ross C. Brodie.
New helicopter-borne TEM system HoriZOND for effective exploration
Alexey Trusov, Oleg Kontarovich.
Lessons learned from a decade of AIP modelling
Andrea Viezzoli.
Some comparisons of AEM systems for specific mineral exploration problems
Michael Whitford, Andrew Fitzpatrick.
Noise Considerations for TEMPEST Data
Peter Wolfgram, Teo Hage, Eric Steele.
Australian continental-scale multilayered chronostratigraphic interpretation of airborne electromagnetics
Sebastian C. T. Wong, Ian C. Roach, Karen A. Connors, Juliana F. M. Vilhena, Liam Pitt, Malcolm G. Nicoll, Jackie A. Hope, Marie-Aude Bonnardot, Ross C. Brodie, Alan Yusen Ley-Cooper.
Enhanced Weathering and Oxidation Modelling in Coals by Integration of ATEM Results with Standard Coal Geoscience Data at Peak Downs Mine, Queensland, Australia
Amanda Zawada, Jonathan Lowe, Geoff Peters.
Beyond conductive targets: Characterizing lithium-prospective lacustrine evaporite mineral systems of North America’s Basin and Range Province with regional-scale AEM
Lyndsay B. Ball, Paul A. Bedrosian, Chloe D. Gustafson.
Airborne electromagnetic imaging for critical-minerals resource assessment
Paul A Bedrosian, Lyndsay B Ball, Chloe Gustafson, Patricia MacQueen.
AEM base frequency and depth of investigation
Magdel Combrinck, Richard Wright.
TEMPEST Data System Bandwidth Comparisons
Nirocca Devkurran, Eric Steele, David Murray, Mohamed Abubeker, Kah Tho Lee.
Automated integration of AEM data, VES and borehole logs
Stefano Galli, Frans Schaars, Frank Smits, Lucas Borst, Arianna Rapiti, Gianluca Fiandaca.
An overview of SkyTEM surveys in New Zealand: data acquisition, community engagement, and results from Northland
Maiwenn Herpe, Thomas Brakenrig, Stewart Cameron, Jane Frances, Richard Kellett, Ben Pasco, Zara Rawlinson, Tusar Sahoo, Rogier Westerhoff, Chris Worts, Jesper Bjergsted Pedersen, Nikolaj Foged, Andrew Kass.
Airborne electromagnetics: dealing with the aircraft speed
Evgeny Karshakov.
Adaptive correction for airborne electromagnetic measurements
Andrey Volkovitsky, Evgeny Karshakov.
Targeting epithermal Au-Ag using helicopter TDEM, magnetic, and radiometric data at Lawyers Project, North-Central BC, Canada.
Jean M. Legault, Karl Kwan, Jim Greig, Ewan Webster, Mark Hanki.
An Airborne Heterodyne Sulphide Exploration Test at Kempfield
James Macnae, Terry Kratzer.
Using airborne electromagnetics to improve depth to bedrock estimates in Wisconsin
Burke J. Minsley, Jade Crosbie, Jim Duncker, Daniel Feinstein, Lisa Haas, Dave Hart, Randy Hunt, Matt Komiskey.
EEMstudio: an open-source freeware QGIS plugin for processing, modelling and inversion of electric and electromagnetic data
Nicole Anna Lidia Sullivan, Andrea Viezzoli, Gianluca Fiandaca.
Other Recent Conference Mirrors
Research papers by Velseis: Recent Publications or Publication Archive